Sitting on the Fence, Hiding in the Hedgerows

I became a vegetarian when I was fourteen. This was an uncomfortable decision as I grew up in a rural farming community, spent much of my childhood playing and occasionally helping out on friends farms. My family isn’t very far away from farming, my grandparents grew up on farms. Almost everyone I knew found my decision a little odd and they struggled to get their heads around it. I love the farming community, like many growing up in a rural area I was involved with a local YFC [Young Farmers Club], it is the land I grew up in. Whilst I was clearly different, seen as a leftie and had a sandal on one foot, my other foot stayed in a wellie, happy to be out in the mud.

What had caused this fairly radical decision was learning about intensive farming. That some of the meat I ate came from animals reared indoors on feed grown with artificial fertilisers and pesticides on giant fields with no relation to the small family farms of my area. Whilst I was happy to eat from the traditionally reared animals, who grazed outside on local farms, I was deeply unhappy about eating meat from intensive production. Everyone else seemed less troubled by this, though noone, somewhat oddly, was hostile, I was being agreed with to an extent, I only rarely suffered from the ‘bloody vegetarians’ jibe. As a fourteen year old, I wasn’t responsible for the food on my table, so the only way I could guarantee not eating food I objected to was to go vegetarian.

My parents attitude was that this was just a ‘phase’ and they said this was fine if you cook your own meals, so I learnt how to cook. I didn’t look back as this allowed to to experiment and discover interesting tasty meals. A few years later I left home for a big city, where butchers shops were already dying and people were almost exclusively buying meat from supermarkets, with scant labelling as to production methodology, this at least made my life easier as I didn’t even know how to get meat I was happy with. I couldn’t understand why no-one else was as troubled by my dilemma around food.

I then felt a pressure to go vegan. It seemed you either support farming or went vegan, there is no middle ground or place for a ‘fence sitter’ such as myself. I was still buying milk, because in Britain at the time most milk was still from pasture based producution from small farms and cheese would have been even harder to give up, I love blue cheeses. As the years past this was changing, the small dairy farms and dairies were disappearing rapidly, I needed to make a decision about milk.

In the 90s there was a craze for organic produce, it even became available in the supermarkets. Organic production standards require animals to graze on pasture, so in organic milk I could be assured, so took the decision to only buy organic milk. I also took the decision, to start eating organic meat. I’d never objected to killing animals for food, I grew up in the countryside amongst natures continuing cycle of birth and death. I’ve never intentionally killed an animal myself, I’ve hit the odd rabbit or badger with my car and I have seen people and animals die in front of me.

The thing was I was now a competent vegan cook and hadn’t eaten meat for fourteen years. I’d been brought up to cook from scratch so I had to learn how to cook meat from scratch and never out outside of the home. Also organic meat is relatively expensive, so it became a weekly treat. For years I’ve eaten meat containing meals two or three times a week with the majority of meals vegan or vegetarian. It turns out this could be the most sustainable diet we can have and mirrors how Britons ate for millenia.

I grew up at a time when traditional farming, mixed rotational farming, was in decline, yet in rural upland Wales it continued to an extent. I went to YFC events such as ploughing and hedging competitions, yet such skills as hedging [making hedges] were in rapid decline. However in places like the USA and Australia, small single family farms were fast disappearing, to create ‘mega farms’ of vast fields to produce food industrially with artificial fertilisers, pesticides and GM [genetically modified] seeds. Animals are managed indoors. This “modern” farming produces food at scales the small traditional farms could not hope to compete with commercially, as the new capitalism of Thatcher and Reagan demanded ever cheaper food to create capital. The hedgerows, trees and awkward parcels of land were “improved”/ destroyed to facilitate cheap production.

We are now at a point of crisis from climate change. Wider society is waking up to these challenges and meat production is seen as part of the problem. We are all responsible for the way we as humanity produce food. More and more people are going vegan as the way to at least do something about it. Yet this has produced a false dichotomy. Farmers being blamed for the food production system they’ve been forced into by the supermarkets and large corporations and vegans for reliance on unsustainable imported food. These arguments are a distraction from the real issue of what sustainable agriculture looks like.

If you look at a typical Mid-West US farm today, you will find vast fields of grain, watered by equally vast pivot irrigation systems, managed by vast heavy machinery such as combine harvesters with GM seeds with a special coating to provide the soil microbiology absent from the soil, with the cattle kept in vast sheds with the associated health issues, but we can keep developing expensive supplements to get around that. This system feeds the world but it is an incredibly vulnerable system, reliant on so many inputs and is increasingly expensive as new varieties of seeds and treatments are continually required to keep up with the pathogens, there is a whole multi-billion pound industry constantly developing new treatments. If this system goes, the world will starve.

Contrast this with traditional farming. A traditionally managed field is rotated, one year it may have barley for winter feed for animals, another year vegetables for sale and winter feed, hay pasture for winter feed, pasture for grazing for a few years, a rest year. All the while, manure from the animals returns nutrients to the soil, the lack of heavy machinery restricts soil campaction, so a healthy soil is maintained, with a rich microbiota that can usually outcompete pathogens. Hedgerows maintain a niche for birds and insects who will also feed on pathogens. All with a farmer keeping an eye on things to make sure that nature is preserved but not taking over the fields from production, it’s a delicate highly skilled balancing act to produce enough food to sell to the rest of us. Yields are not as great, as some of the crop will be lost, more human labour is required making it less ‘efficient’. Yet it is a sustainable system.

Unfortunatly, even if we collectively decided that we wanted and needed this sustainability, it could not feed the world. The worlds population has increased massively over the past fifty years and we don’t have more land to get, there is none left. I think the farmers I knew growing up were sceptical of the changes and didn’t like losing their traditions, so this was why they had some sympathy with me, but were economically compelled to adopt some intensive practices and considered me the ‘lefty’ economically illiterate townie.

I almost hate that my concerns about food and farming have been perhaps correct. It’s not actually sitting uncomfortably on the fence, it’s simply a recognition that the dichotomy, the arguments we have on social media is a false one. If as a planet we cut out intensively produced meat and maximised arable production for human consumption, we could allow much much more sustainable agriculture. It’s not about giving up meat, livestock are an important element of the agriculture system. It’s for most people now, eating less meat, but when you do it will be more tasty, nutritious and more of a pleasure. A free-range chicken or grass fed cow contains much more essential micronutrients than the intensively produced one and has a rich taste with little need for additional flavouring. The traditional British ‘meat and two veg’ meal isn’t bland if you get traditionally produced food, it is full of interesting flavours. If we saw meat as a treat and as part of a sustainable system and had vegan meals for the mostpart, we would be progressing to a sustainable existence on this planet.

Sometimes I wish I’d have had the confidence to shout a little louder when I was younger.

Hyper Normal Cows

hyper normal cows

This picture is from the 19th century. At the time there was a trend to breed larger livestock and over-feed them, as the chap is doing in the picture, to produce excessively large cows. It has been suggested that this was for little more than as a status symbol, the bigger your cow the higher your status as a farmer. However they were not normal cows, they were not healthy cows and would have had obscenely high levels of fat.

One of the big televisual events of this week was the airing of George Monbiot’s “Apocalypse Cow” a documentary to raise awareness of the lack of sustainability of rearing cows for food, looking specifically at Britain. My social media has erupted yet again with farmers upset at seeming to be targeted as the bad guys. This perception is bolstered by aggression directed towards the farming community by those demanding sustainability, largely extremist vegans. In reality, this is a false perception, so it was disappointing that Mr Monbiot failed to ensure this was not the ‘take home message’ of the programme. I think it’s all to do with hypernormalisation.

As a man, I shave my face. When I started shaving I experimented with various methodologies and concluded that what worked best for me was wet shaving using a traditional brush and a soap block. However, over the years getting hold of reasonable quality block soap for shaving on the high street has become ever harder. Harder because most people who wet shave purchase cans to produce their shaving foam. This is surely an inferior way to shave for several reasons:

1/ the quality of the foam isn’t as good. 2/ It’s environmentally damaging as a single block of soap will last longer then several cans 3/ the cans are much more expensive.

It seems that most men are not making the optimal choice, particularly financially. This may because of marketing. I have never seen an advert for block shaving soap, but I have seen countless adverts for cans of shaving foam on the telly and in magazines as the only way to be a “Real Man”. The reason for that is likely because the soap makers  and the retailers make more money from selling multiple quantities of the more expensive cans. Use of cans is now regarded as the normal way to shave. The whole process of how society shifted to an inferior product is an example of hypernormalisation, normalisation of something that rationally is abnormal. Everyone kind of knows that this situation is bad, yet continue to buys cans of shaving foam. It is also partly this desire to conform, to not be the oddball who buys block soap like their ‘old-fashioned’ grandfathers did.

The conspiracy theorist in me has a theory about this. In most supermarkets, you are lucky if there is one shaving block soap. If there is only one it is usually Wilkinson Sword shaving soap, this has to be the worst shaving soap ever produced; it is very difficult to get a decent lather with it. Every other block soap brand produces a good lather.  Anyone who experiments with block shaving soap is likely to trial it with Wilkinson Sword soap, so they conclude that it’s a poor way to shave and go back to the cans. It is entirely possible that Wilkinson Sword simply produce poor soap to encourage people to buy canned foam to boost their profits. This is perhaps the inherent weakness of modern capitalism.

This hypernormalisation also happens with cows. Society has become accustomed to generally buying cheap, intensively produced meat through this process of hyper-normalisation. As household food budgets are squeezed, the idea of spending more to get sustainable local produce seems crazy, let alone the hassle of queuing at the butchers on a Saturday morning. There is the idea that it is only oddballs that obsess about only buying sustainable meat, have become vegans, or indeed do really mad stuff like learn to speak Welsh as an adult.

These conventions of habit and hypernormalised thinking need to change if humanity has any hope of averting the looming climate crisis. There was a very poignant example of this in Apocalypse Cow.

One segment of the programme involved Mr Monbiot visiting a pasture based cattle farm. Mr Monbiot was accusing the farmer of not being sustainable. The farmer was visibly upset by this accusation as hers was a traditional, extensive, pasture -based farm and she was carrying on the long proud tradition of cattle farming on that farm, how was she not one of the good guys? Mr Monbiot then delved further about the feed supplements that she used, which contained unsustainable palm oil. To feed her traditional cows she was playing a part in the destruction of primary forest to release land for production of palm oil. Hence, her farm was not as sustainable as she thought. She had believed that her farm was sustainable through hypernormalisation. Both the farmer, the shaver and everyone else are victims of hypernormalisation leading to unsustainable situations like the world is in now. Everyone else buys these sacks of animal feed, it is normalised.

These myths are so easily entrenched, most of us exist in these self-confirmatory social bubbles, telling us that we are the good guys and the baddies are elsewhere. The uncomfortable truth is that we are kind of all the bad guys when it comes to the environment, our intentions are good, but we have been misled through hypernormalisation. The vast majority of farms in Wales fail to achieve sustainability, even the hill farms I grew up around.

I’m currently reading John Davies’ ‘History of Wales and here are some quotations from the book:

“Welsh rural communities experienced greater changes in the thirty years following the Second World War than they had in the previous three hundred years. The key change was mechanisation… Between 1950 and 1970 the number of sheep in Wales increased from 3.8 million to 6 million, cows from 369,000 to 528,000 and a decrease in hectares under grain by 45%”

That is a substantial change. If we imagine the  practises of my grandfathers’ farms compared to them now the differences are substantial, but aren’t at first glance. I think it is reasonable to suggest that those farms were sustainable; they grew fruit, vegetables and grain for human consumption and as winter supplements for their herds, didn’t use pesticides and fertilisers as has now become normalised and probably had greater areas of the farm as nature refuges, such a trees and hedgerows, where the soils had time to recover from grazing, to get the nutrients back into the grasses. Those processes are likely now reduced due to modern practises, they may have passed a tipping point on many farms.

It can be understood that through these changes we have made Welsh farming unsustainable. We are losing biodiversity and the ecosystem services provided to keep the soils, plants and animals healthy and full of quality nutrients at a rapid rate. Where Wales is fortunate is that to develop sustainable agriculture should not involve major changes to our farms. Welsh farms can be sustainable with relatively minor changes to practises compared to much of world agriculture. We do kind of need to return to the ‘Child’s First Farm Book” with a pictures of cows and sheep, a couple of pig sties and chickens pecking around the farm yard, surrounded by abundant wild birds, because it it is mixed farms that are the most sustainable and productive.

My other criticism of Apocalypse cow was the suggestion that all of the UK under pasture can be rewilded and we can eat instead food from bacteria grown in vats. The problem with academics or ideas people is they ask the “What if?” questions. Attempting to answer those questions leads to some big useful numbers, so we can predict how much carbon is stored in the remaining parts of the Amazon rainforest. However this scientific, big picture thinking doesn’t break through very well to the general public, it doesn’t relate to our understood reality or the farm next door.

We may indeed as a species need to grow food in vats to get us through this environmental crisis. However we are still going to need some fresh fruit and veg and the most sustainable way of doing that is to also rear some animals on the land to facilitate nutrient cycles. It is often said we need to ‘Think global, act local” however this message makes it look here as though farming itself is to blame, rather than the broken system of capitalism at work that is responsible for all this hypernormalisation of unsustainable practises.

We are all the bad guys. We all know it’s wrong to buy so much plastic, so much food from the other side of the world and many of us non-farmers in the developed world drive to work. we kind of know this commuting is wrong, but we have to do it to have a job, we have little choice, so we can buy food to put on out tables and only have time to visit supermarkets in the evenings when the butchers is closed. Farmers are no more to blame than the rest of us, so we should not pick on farmers as being the bad guys here.

The real bad guys I suppose are the beneficiaries of our broken system of capitalism, the fat cats of big ag’, multi-national corporations and corrupt governments run by people far removed from the land and the everyday life for regular people. The people who allowed it to be decided that promoting cans of shaving foam, sourcing animal feed from primary forests was an okay idea and not tackling the housing crisis forcing so many of us to not live where we work.

So, how do we resolve all these problems? They are big and complicated and they are powerful vested interests in not changing them. I believe that what we need to do is work together, gather data, share ideas and best practise, and support those making an effort. What will hinder us is the divide and rule of the rich and powerful, who will set Farmer against Vegan , Brexitier against Remainer, Town against Countryside, Welsh against the English. If we can get beyond that and work together we can have a better quality, more sustainable quality of life, with wonderful productive farms with the highest animal welfare standards so that even those who believe it is morally wrong to rear animals for meat can accept those farms providing a service for those that don’t believe so.

We have to get beyond this black and white, good guys and bad guys, the reality is always more complicated.

The Good Guys and the Bad Guys

On a personal note, I think the best way to achieve this is stronger democracy and more local government by people who live in and understand our communities, from the bottom-up  rather than the top down. That is why I support Welsh independence.